Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

Hunger Rumblings

The ELCA World Hunger staff and their associates blog about world hunger, its causes and solutions, and anything else they find relevant.

Thursday, October 2, 2008

ELCA on the Travel Channel

The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) is currently running two ads on the Travel Channel. You can view them here. According to the ELCA News Service:


"'We hope that through television, billboards and printmedia, members of the
ELCA will be equipped to own and tell this church's story, the story of what God
is doing in us and through us for the sake of the world,' Bangert said."
We in ELCA World Hunger especially like these two ads because in addition to telling what it means to be Lutheran, they also demonstrate that there are many ways to approach the problem of hunger. Again, from the ELCA News Service:
"One television spot -- "Hope" -- shows a woman quizzing her daughter as they
walk along a road near Yeumbeul, Senegal. It highlights Senegal Lutheran
Mission, which teaches women how to start their own businesses.

The other spot -- "Dignity" -- opens with workers setting tables in a fancy
restaurant. The "restaurant" is actually Trinity Lutheran Church, Bismarck,
N.D., and volunteers are preparing a banquet for homeless neighbors."

I've written before about the importance of girls education to reducing poverty and hunger. Teaching women how to start their own businesses falls along the same lines and addresses the 3rd Millennium Development Goal: Promote gender equality and empower women. Poverty is disproportionately prevalent among female-headed households. In many places, patriarchal societies make it difficult for women to own property, find work, or participate in decisions that effect them. Thus marginalized, they lack the means to provide for themselves or their children.


On the other hand, women who are able to earn their own incomes have more choices and greater ability to lift themselves out of poverty. What's more, this ability typically spills over to their children. Educated women are better positioned to tend to their children's health and educational needs, thus raising a future generation that is also healthier and more skilled. Beyond education, women with their own income have greater access to resources, and more power in their communities. The work the ELCA is doing in Senegal and other places to help women start their own businesses is critically important to ending hunger.

The ad about serving a meal to homeless neighbors is another part of the fight to end hunger. Education is critically important, but when you're hungry right now, simply eating is top priority. Without adequate food and nutrition, people are more vulnerable to illness, lack the calories to physically move through the day, and are less able to concentrate. Is it any wonder that hungry people are unable to work and, without work, unable to pay for shelter? In such cases, food aid is just as important as longer-term solutions like education. Again, the work of the ELCA is critically important to ending hunger.

It's a lot to think about during that next commercial break.

-Nancy Michaelis

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

The Nature of Power

One of our hunger volunteers, Mary, forwarded me a link to an interesting blog posting. It's written by Brian Konkol, a missionary who has recently moved to South Africa. In his March 11th post, he talks about a class he's taking with several African students from different countries. They are discussing power in the world, who has it, how they use it, etc. The Africans point out to Brian that regardless of its popularity, the United States holds great power and influence throughout the world. The discussion causes Brian to ponder whether "we Americans... have used our vast collective power wisely."

Brian, in turn, has caused me to ponder. The word "collective" really got my attention. What is the role of an individual American in wielding American power? I have absolutely no data to support this next claim, but here it is: I think that most Americans feel pretty divorced from the actions of the government, and especially its foreign policy. Of course there are exceptions. Politicians, lobbyists and activists are obvious ones. But how many of us, our friends, our family, feel they have anything to do with the Farm Bill? With federal budget allocations? With diplomatic relations?

Of course many of us vote, and that's important (though many of us don't!). But it's often an isolated act. And to be perfectly honest, I don't usually feel responsible for the ultimate outcome. I pick the candidate that seems to most closely align with my values and then hope for the best. Or I vote punitively, selecting the opposing candidate, regardless of who it is, in hopes of getting rid of the incumbent. Either way, once the voting is done, many of us return to our lives and shake our heads if the news is bad. Outside of this occasional activity, I suspect most Americans don't feel they have a role in how American power is used in the world.

I've sometimes heard statements like, "We don't have anything against the American people; it's the government (or policy, or administration) we have issues with." I think this statement is meant to make criticism easier to accept, but I wonder if instead it doesn't just further divorce us from our government and policies. "Oh. They're not talking about me! I'm not part of the government. I'll just get back to what I was doing." But is that true? Don't we claim a representative government? Don't we claim it represents its citizens - us? me?

Like Brian, I don't really have answers. If you do, I'd love to hear them - please leave a comment! But I will continue to ponder what it means for an individual American to wield American power outside of a career in politics. Because American power in the world certainly has a role in ending hunger, and if I can wield some of that, I want to.

Labels: ,